

sanctions and export control laws by selling aircraft parts to customers in Iran, Sudan, and Burma. In 2010, Fokker self-reported to government officials that it had possibly violated U.S.

is a Dutch company that provides products and technical services to the aerospace industry.

Circuit overcorrected and reinforced the executive branch’s unchecked discretion over DPAs by reassuring prosecutors that future courts will rubber stamp such agreements.įokker Services B.V. By ostensibly precluding judicial review of a DPA’s negotiated terms, the D.C. a court is not authorized to reject a DPA based on a finding that the “charging decisions” and “conditions agreed to in the DPA” are inadequate. in which it held that to preserve “the Executive’s long-settled primacy over charging,” 6 × 6. Circuit subsequently curtailed these efforts in United States v. However, three recent district court decisions have attempted to assert a more substantive role for the court - declaring that an Article III judge is not a “potted plant” 3 × 3. district and magistrate judges who handled cases involving a DPA, that judges “were generally not involved in the DPA process”). Gov’t Accountability Office, supra, at 25 (reporting, based on a survey of twelve U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GAO-10-110, Corporate Crime 8, 25 (2009)) see also U. Mike Koehler, Measuring the Impact of Non-Prosecution and Deferred Prosecution Agreements on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement, 49 UC Davis L. Traditionally, judicial scrutiny over the DPA’s terms has been “essentially nonexistent.” 2 × 2. In a DPA, the government agrees to dismiss filed charges if a corporation complies with negotiated conditions that are aimed at punishing the misconduct and allowing the corporation to demonstrate rehabilitation. Garrett, Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations 41, 44, 55 (2014). Since the Arthur Andersen prosecution in which thousands of innocent workers lost their jobs, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has increasingly turned to deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to avoid the collateral consequences of a corporate criminal conviction.
